Google Docs – A worthwhile alternative to Microsoft Office?

September 7, 2009

My Personal Evaluation of Google Docs

Filed under: Uncategorized — Dan Giles @ 5:48 AM

____

Positive aspects

There are many features that I believe Google Docs have done well with:

  • A user interface that is similar to an actual word processor.
  • The ability to store your documents online and view them with a free word processor (not necessary to have Microsoft Office installed).
  • It’s ability to allow many people to edit one document.
  • It’s close integration to other Google products, including Gmail.
  • A powerful file manager that enables the user to organise their documents in the same way they would on a file management program provided by the computer’s operating system (e.g. Windows Explorer for PCs or Finder for Mac).
Google Docs File Browser

Google Docs File Browser

  • The user can easily sort documents in categories and even place stars on them (like you do in an e-mail inbox)
  • Its ability to export files into various formats (especially PDF and html, though the html file actually doesn’t look very professional).
  • If opening e-mail attachments (from Gmail), it is faster to open them in Google Docs than trying to download the attachment and go through the process of opening Adobe Reader or Microsoft Office to view them.
  • Can insert multimedia content (such as YouTube videos). Cannot do this in Microsoft Office.
  • Includes a language translator and links to an online dictionary.
  • Can also highlight a word and easily do a Google search (on the web) with that word.
Google Search in action

Google Search in action

  • Google includes its powerful search engine in both the file management page and in the help centre. It even auto completes your search after typing in the first couple of letters of a file name (screenshot above).
Reviewing changes in a document

Reviewing changes in a document

Revision History showing a list of versions of a particular document

Revision History showing a list of versions of a particular document

  • Saving documents:
    • Documents being auto saved in case a technical failure occurs.
    • Being able to review and even compare changes between past versions of a document (in Microsoft Word, you have to manually save if you’d like different versions of the one document; and the compare feature works well in much the same way that ‘Track Changes’ operates in Microsoft Word).
  • Deleted documents are stored in a trash can, enabling the user to recover documents if they are accidentally deleted.
  • Depending on the web browser and if Google Gears (an offline technology that allows people to use some Google services offline) is installed on the computer, users can work on their documents even when they are not connected to the internet. Changes are then synchronised with the web server once the computer is online.
  • Provides a print preview as a PDF file.

Negative aspects

Some areas of the technology that could be improved upon:

  • It is a slimmed down version of what Microsoft offer in their Office suite. It really only has partial Microsoft Office compatibility, which is fine for basic documents but documents with more complex formatting are better done in Microsoft Office (as it offers more features). This is also based on my experience on trying alternative Office suites to the Microsoft software, but in the end needing to be fully compatible with most computer users (who use Microsoft Office).
  • Though the file browser is good, I find it an adjustment to get use to compared to Finder on my Mac.
  • Though Google Docs does have its benefits in not having to transfer files from one computer to the other and is helpful if you forget a USB stick. Some people would prefer to store their documents on their hard-drive rather than on the internet (especially those with limited internet access or those who fear the security of Google storing their documents for them).
  • The presentation software doesn’t support transitions, sound or animation, which presentation software similar to PowerPoint should have.
  • File size limit to both the size of individual documents and the storage space the user is allowed to have on Google Docs (though ‘power users’ can also pay a subscription to gain more storage).
  • If the user imports a Microsoft Office document with headers, footers or footnotes into Google Docs, they may either display poorly or not at all. If they create those items in Google Docs, they display well in a PDF but not in the document editor or when exported into Microsoft Word.
  • Upon clicking the Spell Checker tool, it highlights the spelling mistakes in yellow for you. It took me a while to discover that you had to click on each individual word before it would bring up options of alternative spellings. Microsoft Office uses a dialogue box (as well as being able to right-click misspelled words).
  • Not really a ‘what you see is what you get’ type of program, especially with the HTML formatting involved.

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.